As I understand, we should bump Nemo.jl versions to 0.32-0.38 in StructuralIdentifiability.jl ?

https://github.com/SciML/StructuralIdentifiability.jl/actions/runs/7167680162/job/19514247808#step:5:44

At the moment, ParamPunPam.jl restricts Nemo.jl to 0.32-0.37, and StructuralIdentifiability.jl restricts Nemo.jl to 0.24-0.38. Hence, the lowest possible bound is 0.32

As I understand, we should bump Nemo.jl versions to 0.32-0.38 in StructuralIdentifiability.jl ?

https://github.com/SciML/StructuralIdentifiability.jl/actions/runs/7167680162/job/19514247808#step:5:44

At the moment, ParamPunPam.jl restricts Nemo.jl to 0.32-0.37, and StructuralIdentifiability.jl restricts Nemo.jl to 0.24-0.38. Hence, the lowest possible bound is 0.32

Yes, I agree 0.32 looks like the lowest feasible

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (5d71f49) 89.90% compared to head (c3bab78) 89.90%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #255   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.90%   89.90%           
=======================================
  Files          25       25           
  Lines        3209     3209           
=======================================
  Hits         2885     2885           
  Misses        324      324           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Note for future self: make sure that Groebner.jl v0.6.1 supports Nemo.jl v0.39 (currently v0.6.0 does not https://github.com/sumiya11/Groebner.jl/blob/v0.6.0/Project.toml)

In the light of
#260

@pogudingleb thanks for fixing this! I also have this check in Groebner.jl now